Rationality and Risk
The summer before my senior year of high school, my parents
told me we would be moving from Portland, Oregon to Edmond, Oklahoma. Until
that point, I had assumed I would simply follow in my older brother’s footsteps
by attending Oregon State University. OSU had a decent engineering program and,
at only 80 miles from home, would allow me to visit my family (and dogs!) on
the weekend. The big college question so many high schoolers stress about had
hardly even crossed my mind. Knowledge of the move opened my eyes to the
options that had been there all along. I was never told I had to choose a state
school, and finding out my familial roots were being transplanted led me to
question the possibilities. Still uncertain on what I wanted to do or where I
wanted to be, I ended up applying to a dozen schools across the US.
I share that story because it is the first important
decision I made in my life and it was filled with uncertainty. Obviously if
you’re in econ 490, you know what school I ultimately chose. As much as I
researched colleges, the things I learned were grounded in facts and
statistics. Having never so much as stepped foot in the state of Illinois, these were the only things I could base my
decision on. My choice to attend Illinois was formed almost completely on the
reputation of their engineering program (fun fact: my original major was
bioengineering). Out of all the colleges I was accepted to, Illinois’
engineering program was the most highly ranked, so it seemed like my best
option.
This decision was the first of many that would be made in
the interest of my future. By the end of my first semester at Illinois, it
became apparent to me that engineering was not my passion. As an unsure high
schooler, I had selected engineering based on my mathematical ability and the
prospect of a lucrative career. Now the discontent I felt was evident in my
mood and my grades. No matter how hard I studied, it seems I just couldn’t
grasp material that was coming so naturally to everyone else. Why hadn’t I
prepared better, even studied over the summer to get on track? At Christmas, I
flew home to Oklahoma for the first time, feeling dejected and scared to admit,
even to myself, that choosing Illinois might have been a mistake.
One month spent with family during winter break was enough
to refresh me; upon going back to Illinois I decided I was just going to have
to try harder. Engineering at Illinois had to work out, because I couldn’t
handle feeling like I had failed all my friends and family I had abandoned when
I moved to the middle of these cornfields. I wasn’t a quitter, and if I could
just push through these next 7 semesters I had almost sure job placement and a
sweet starting salary to look forward to…
Not to spoil the end of the story, but in the interest of
speeding it up, you’ve probably already figured out that engineering didn’t
work out for me. After one more semester, I decided to switch from
bioengineering to materials science engineering. Optimistically, I hoped that
maybe it wasn’t engineering I disliked, but just the major I had chosen. After
one more year struggling through the materials science program I finally
conceded. I was never going to enjoy engineering, and the more time I spent
trying to force myself to like it because of pride, greed, or whatever insanity
was fueling me just wasn’t worth it. I didn’t want to waste any more time in a
program I disliked, and I especially didn’t want to spend the rest of my life
in a passionless career.
After more research, I decided to switch to economics.
Essentially this was a choice revealed through eliminating other alternatives.
It was too late to switch to the business program, actuarial science was hardly
accepting any applicants (not to mention the thought of being a number cruncher
for life seemed daunting), and economics was something I had enjoyed since high
school. Since I still wasn’t sure what I wanted in terms of a career, it seemed
like a general enough platform that I could propel myself through college and
have plenty of options after. Better yet, the college of LAS was opposite the
college of engineering in almost every regard.
My decisions in terms of majors have always been made with
an eye toward the future. It’s important to enjoy your career, but majoring in
something simply because you enjoy it when there are slim job prospects never
made much sense to me. At least in my family, having a career is the ability to
support yourself and make a positive impact. My dad likes to tell us kids that
“if you have more good days than bad days, you’re doing okay” and I think that
is true for a career as well. You might not love every single day you go to
work, but if you are passionate about what you do and feel like your work is
making a difference, you will likely perform better and ensure more good days
than bad.
My parents are very supportive of their children’s
decisions, but they have always stressed the importance of rational decision
making – thinking through all the potential outcomes, weighing your options,
doing the research. In a way, they have been teaching us how to eliminate risk
and uncertainty. I’m very lucky to have parents that have supported all the
twists and turns in my life’s journey thus far. Their generosity in paying for
my college has alleviated the stress of loans; had I been paying for every
credit hour, I may not have switched my major and instead endured the grueling
bioengineering program to wind up in a field I was not truly passionate about.
Working throughout college I’ve managed to save more than I
spent over the last four years, which is something I couldn’t have done if I had
paid for school myself. This cushion will help alleviate some of my future
income risk. The ability to base my job search out of my parent’s home will
lessen this burden even more, as my expenses will drop to practically zero.
While I hope to find a job within three months after graduation this winter,
I’m lucky that I don’t have to stress about running out of money in the process
of looking.
Sixteen years of education have prepared me for the moment
when I will enter the real world. Over that time, my experiences have built who
I am, preferences have been revealed, and dreams have taken shape. I’m as ready
now as I have ever been to face the future. And yet I’m going to say what is on
pretty much every collegiate mind throughout history as they have stood on this
same cliff just before graduation where I now find myself: I am both terrified
and thrilled for what is to come.
Diving into these emotions, I think they are rooted in the
very same topics we are now discussing in class, risk and uncertainty.
Regardless of which end of the risk spectrum you classify yourself, all humans
share an emotional response to risk. For the risk seekers, this might be a
sense of thrill, a rush of adrenaline. For the risk adverse, these emotions
might manifest themselves as anxiety or fear.
Perhaps the more risk adverse you are, the more you might
plan so that uncertainty can be mitigated. This is a thought I had never really
considered until writing this post, but now that I think about myself I find it
to be true. As someone who tends to be more risk adverse, I have always been a
planner. I make lists. I always schedule in more time than I think I’ll need to
get ready or to travel somewhere. I’m not sure when these habits first emerged
in my life, but reflecting on them now, I am almost certain they evolved as a
response to my negative feelings toward uncertainty. The biggest exception to
these habits that subconsciously govern my life pertains to my future. When it
comes to where I will be working less than one year from now, there is a
massive black hole on the road map of my life. Despite this, I feel a sense of
calm that defies my usual response to uncertain outcomes.
My optimistic perception of the job market is certainly
shaped by the experiences of family and friends who had to deal with these
things before me. My dad was a farm boy from rural Nebraska who was recruited
out of college to do consultant work; 30 years later he is the type of
businessman I can only aspire to be. My brother, whom I mentioned earlier,
graduated OSU with a pre-pharmacy/chemistry degree. In the interim summer
between undergrad and applying to grad school, he got a job through a family
friend at an asphalt paving company. 10 years later he is now a chief
estimator for that same company and is happier getting to work in the field
than he ever could have been in a lab.
For me, these are all examples that life works out for the
best. Sure, the decisions we make are all important in the sense that they can
set us on the right track, but I think I’ve learned just as much from the plans
I made that didn’t work out; things like perseverance, the importance of
maintaining a good attitude, and even how to deal with failure. Admittedly, I
have not taken every possible precaution to manage my future income risk, but
I’ve learned to trust the process. Humans are emotional beings, so
unfortunately making the “rational decision” isn’t always our best bet, as my
experiences mentioned above have indicated. Risk adversion, in other terms, is a fear of the unknown, and I don't think decisions should be made out of fear. Sometimes the best outcomes are a result of taking a risk, trusting your gut, and jumping off the cliff into the unknown on a leap of faith.
Wow! It felt as if you opened a vein in writing this post.
ReplyDeleteLet me make one observation that I'm sure you are aware of but may have been too nice to mention. Engineering has had cultural issues about recruiting women as students and about retaining them. Plus, engineering has a pretty high washout rate in general. I mentioned in class today that Engineering has a reputation for the toughest grading of any college. What I didn't mention is how they can do that and other colleges can't. If you drop out of Engineering, you still have options to transfer to other colleges at the U of I, just as you did. In contrast, if you drop out of LAS you may very well be dropping out of the university. From the campus perspective, internal transfers are fine, but students dropping out of the university altogether is viewed as a black mark. If Engineering bore some of the consequence of that black mark it might make the environment more welcoming (but it might hurt them in the ratings). In any event, I think you should view your trajectory as at least part a consequence of the environment and not all on you.
When you say you are a planner, I'd like to flesh that out more. Bur first consider this quote from Dwight Eisenhower, which I really like.
In preparing for battle I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.
My spin on this is that - in the particular contingency you can't fully go off a script. There is still a need to exercise discretion then. But in exercising discretion, have much prior thought about the contingency is very useful. Then your choices are informed by your prior thought. I will add that this is more of an issue once you have a management position. It may not be a big deal when you are only managing yourself. The issue is whether others consider you sensitive to the circumstances. If your prior scripted idea doesn't seem to fit the particular contingency very well, you will then be considered too rigid as a manager. If you always wing it (not an issue for you but to complete the argument) then you risk being perceived as giving no forethought to the decisions. So the goal is some balance between these two extremes. And the issue in achieving that balance is whether you indulge your prior disposition or try to combat it. When you've figured that one out please let me know how you did it.
I encourage you to look at my most recent post to the class Web site. How we respond to risk might very well depend on the nature of the risk and the particular situation. The label - this person is risk averse, that person is risk seeking - is sensitive to context and shouldn't be thought of as universal. For me, I consider myself fairly risk seeking on the learning/trying out new things in the classroom front. I'm quite conservative/risk averse on the financial front. I'd expect that if you consider this from a multidimensional viewpoint, you'd find some variation in your view about risk depending on the setting.
Finally, let me commiserate some about transferring. I did it - changed universities. It was somewhat traumatizing during the process. In retrospect, it was very beneficial to me. I have since come to think of students going to college like choosing a soulmate for life - the issue is whether it is a good fit. A highly rated place may be a good fit for some students but not for others. And much of the uncertainty is inside us. We don't know what we want. I stumbled into economics. It was a good fit for me. i hope you find something equally satisfying for you.
Wow, there's a lot of stuff here! For starters, I know the feel on changing majors. I originally applied to U of I to learn CS, because of good money prospects, but before I got here figured out it wasn't right for me. I spent two years in DGS trying to figure out what WAS, before finally settling into economics.
ReplyDeleteIt seems like you've really put a lot of thought into managing your financial risk. Living at home for a time after college may not be the most exciting prospect, but it's one that I think I'll probably end up doing as well (to build up a little capital and to try and purchase a condo for equity instead of renting). It's interesting to find other risk averse people here at U of I, where I think the culture is one of risk-seeking. I wonder if it's more common in certain departments like econ or engineering?
I found this post very comforting! We have had similar experiences when it comes to difficulty finding a suitable major, and hearing that you are confident moving forward gives me hope for myself. Economics seemed like a good fit for me because, like you said, I felt it left me with plenty of options after college in terms of a career. It seems that Econ is often a major that someone who does not have a specific career in mind but would like to be valuable within a job market choses. This is a way to manage some of the risk that comes with investing in a college education. That being said, it is probably true that people who think this way, or risk averse people, would be interested in Econ anyway.
ReplyDelete